This is believed to be the first photograph of a person (taken by Louis Daguerre in 1838). The street was likely full of people – all in motion and not captured in the long exposure
2 Comments Already
Pingback & Trackback
November 2nd, 2010 @12:59 pm
Related Post
- THE MINE KAFON (November 25th, 2012)
- Amazing behind the back backyard football pass (October 7th, 2012)
- EPIC DODGEBALL KILL (October 6th, 2012)
- Queen Anne Hilltop Dental (September 21st, 2012)
- Transformers (September 20th, 2012)
Please Leave Your Comments Below
Subscribe to Woosk via RSS
Search
Social
Pages
Blogroll
-
- A Biscuit of Many Parts
- A Public Flogging
- ALL Viral Videos and Pics
- AmyOops
- Beer or Kid
- Bits & Pieces
- Blame It On The Voices
- BS.com
- Buy Shaklee Products
- Buzz Reactor
- CALVIN'S NUGGETS OF WISDOM
- Casual Slack
- CNA Salary
- Crazy Pictures
- EPICponyz
- Football Tackle FAIL
- Funktards
- funny videos
- FunnyBBvideos
- Gif Bin
- I have seen the whole of the internet
- ImageLuv Funny Blog
- Jim Smash
- Look At This…
- Northern Michigan Vacation Rentals
- PageSlap
- Ruining The Internet
- School Grants
- Skip’s House of Chaos
- Sober in a Night Club
- Soylent Green
- Spluch
- Super Hero Poker Game
- Tacky Raccoons
- That Girl’s Site
- The Daily Lifeku
- The Sirmarco Letters
- WannaSmile
- Where'd I park my flying car
- Yeah Oops!
- ZanyPickle
Archives
- November 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (2)
- September 2012 (16)
- August 2012 (16)
- July 2012 (10)
- June 2012 (6)
- May 2012 (12)
- April 2012 (6)
- March 2012 (12)
- February 2012 (34)
- January 2012 (35)
- December 2011 (39)
- November 2011 (30)
- October 2011 (26)
- September 2011 (38)
- August 2011 (35)
- July 2011 (30)
- June 2011 (34)
- May 2011 (61)
- April 2011 (56)
- March 2011 (65)
- February 2011 (80)
- January 2011 (91)
- December 2010 (86)
- November 2010 (86)
- October 2010 (86)
- September 2010 (107)
- August 2010 (101)
- July 2010 (99)
- June 2010 (91)
- May 2010 (121)
- April 2010 (112)
- March 2010 (109)
- February 2010 (93)
- January 2010 (108)
- December 2009 (97)
- November 2009 (117)
- October 2009 (109)
- September 2009 (124)
- August 2009 (128)
- July 2009 (105)
- June 2009 (152)
- May 2009 (208)
- April 2009 (218)
- March 2009 (153)
- February 2009 (180)
- January 2009 (211)
- December 2008 (194)
- November 2008 (161)
- October 2008 (99)
- September 2008 (213)
- August 2008 (112)
- July 2008 (49)
- June 2008 (23)
- May 2008 (22)
- April 2008 (22)
- March 2008 (24)
- February 2008 (27)
- January 2008 (18)
- December 2007 (10)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (27)
- September 2007 (38)
- August 2007 (15)
- July 2007 (35)
- June 2007 (32)
- May 2007 (44)
- April 2007 (85)
- March 2007 (29)
- February 2007 (27)
- January 2007 (101)
- December 2006 (81)
- November 2006 (100)
- October 2006 (129)
- September 2006 (179)
- August 2006 (411)
- July 2006 (338)
- June 2006 (174)
- May 2006 (150)
- November 2005 (22)
- October 2005 (37)
- September 2005 (28)
Wow, I had no idea photography was possible that far back. Remarkable. Wonder if the original copy of that photo still exists. Would be a worthwhile addition to any museum.